0
$0.00 0 items

No products in the cart.

FashionMusicArtCulture

Will Dries Van Noten’s Resignation Reconfigure Fashion for the Better? 

26 March 2024

In a darkened room, damp with the evaporated sweat of hundreds of eager NYFW attendees, I witnessed a show that was both tickling and disheartening. The designer, who will remain nameless, presented a series of colourful looks, each punctuated by windswept draping and surrounded by thumping soundwaves. The whole thing felt like a disruption for the sake of disrupting. The show seemed to think it needed to have the right kind of twist to explode across the FYPs to thousands of hungry fashion consumers (myself among them) and experience financial and cultural growth. The designer by no means “fell out of a coconut tree,” as Kamala Harris soliloquised last year. Rather, they were acting within the confines of high fashion. Dries Van Noten would never do such a thing. 

This is not to say that Van Noten’s shows aren’t masterful displays of creativity and innovation. Take his women’s Autumn/Winter 1996–97 show, where a concrete runway was set against a curtain of vivid jewels that twinkled as cameras flashed. The collection reimagined patterns and silhouettes from the early 20th century by incorporating Y2K cuts and accessories. It was one of the shows that helped catapult Van Noten to worldwide acclaim. 

Courtesy Dries Van Noten

Beginning his career as a member of the famed Antwerp Six, Van Noten released his first collection in 1986 and opened his first brick-and-mortar store in 1989. He was never bombastic or overly sensational—at least not for sensation’s sake. He didn’t rely on celebrity placements or viral moments to garner awareness. He insisted on only producing ready-to-wear garments in colourful textiles, even in the 1990s, when minimalism was all-encompassing. His defiance made the news of his retirement even harder to process. 

Van Noten focused on creating clothes that people genuinely want to wear, steering away from elaborate shows based on dynamic sets and metaphors. Even as recently as the AW 2024 show, Van Noten used the colour pink as a playground for experimentation. “You can go quite far with colours, as long as you keep the shapes recognisable,” he told GQ in 2018. 

Without “playing the game,” Dries Van Noten became one of the most beloved designers, entirely because of the aesthetic appeal of his clothing (he rarely launched any advertising campaigns or had distinct marketing strategies). 

Courtesy Dries Van Noten

Now, after 38 years, Van Noten wants to make way for the next generation. Van Noten is stepping down so he can keep the fashion world growing. He is not interested in sensationalism, stagnation or sameness. He wants to reconfigure fashion for the better.

“Moving forward is absolutely necessary. Glorifying the past, definitely not,” Van Noten told HighSnobiety in an interview earlier this year. In his farewell letter, he wrote: “Now, I want to shift my focus to all the things I never had the time for. I’m sad, but at the same time happy, to let you know that I will step down at the end of June. I have been preparing for this moment for a while, and I feel it’s time to leave room for a new generation of talents to bring their vision to the brand. I have full confidence that they will do a great job.”

Story continues below advertisement

Related Articles

Phoebe Philo launches her long-awaited namesake fashion brand

By Sara Hesikova

Schiaparelli kicks off Fall/Winter 2023 haute couture week with wearable art

By Sara Hesikova

Fluid Form Prada’s Spring Summer ’24 Milan Fashion Week Menswear Collection

By To Be Team

LOEWE Comments On Our Internet Selves

By Rachel Weinberg

Britt Murphy and Jaime Butel Capture Australia's Small Towns

By To Be Team

The Power of Manifestation: Introducing Raga Malak

By Annabel Blue

‘Multi-hyphenate’ and ‘multi-disciplinary’ are labels for individuals who embody numerous roles. Yet, the idea of excelling in various fields contradicts what we’re taught growing up: choose one profession, follow one path, be one thing. In fashion—and the creative world at large—that simply isn’t possible. Writers are artists, musicians are graphic designers, directors are actors. Why is this the case? Partly because our industries are under-resourced and largely under-funded, requiring people to take on multiple roles. But more fundamentally, creative people can indeed do many things. And, more importantly, they want to. This issue of to Be explores this very impulse to adapt and redefine our positions, our inclination to shapeshift into the many roles we play.

Sign up to our e-newsletter: