0
$0.00 0 items

No products in the cart.

FashionMusicArtCulture

Nadege Vanhee-Cybulski's Triumvirate

29 September 2024

If there’s one thing Hermes does well, it’s leather. Buttery and soft, Hermes’ leather is in a league of its own, and always takes a prominent position in their ready-to-wear collections. These were clothes for the discerning-of-taste and, above-all, for the practically-minded.

Most looks combined the Hermes icon with either silk, cashmere, and a light, nearly unrecognisable denim. Zips, pockets (cheekily placed on some of the sheer looks), sporty silhouettes, and a strong offering of anoraks contributed to a sense of preparedness. Layering was hero. So too was fuschia, which alongside tan, camel, chocolate brown, white and mustard colours created a versatile, transitional palette. And for the first time, patterned silk was used in the construction of garments, not just scarves.

The showing of bags was second to none. Reversed Birkins winked at the in-the-know that Hermes’ bags are constructed inside-out. Horsehair swished by models’ sides. Amongst several basket bags was a bucket in the shape of a hoof, the perfect embodiment of Vanhee’s modus operandi: modernism in the spirit of heritage.

Impossible to fault on the consistency front, the collection embraced a streets-of-Paris feel just as it did a safari rendezvous. Nadege Vanhee-Cybulski resolved a triumvirate, comprising utility, femininity and craftsmanship.

Story continues below advertisement

Related Articles

The Slow Art of Casual Couture 

By Claire Summers

Reflections on craft and form at Milan Fashion Week

By Rachel Weinberg

Will Dries Van Noten’s Resignation Reconfigure Fashion for the Better? 

By Charlie Kolbrener

Prada’s Road to Somewhere

By Carwyn McIntyre

Yohji Yamamoto Unifies His Various Labels

By Jerome Fisher

A ‘REAL PUNK’

By Rachel Weinberg

‘Multi-hyphenate’ and ‘multi-disciplinary’ are labels for individuals who embody numerous roles. Yet, the idea of excelling in various fields contradicts what we’re taught growing up: choose one profession, follow one path, be one thing. In fashion—and the creative world at large—that simply isn’t possible. Writers are artists, musicians are graphic designers, directors are actors. Why is this the case? Partly because our industries are under-resourced and largely under-funded, requiring people to take on multiple roles. But more fundamentally, creative people can indeed do many things. And, more importantly, they want to. This issue of to Be explores this very impulse to adapt and redefine our positions, our inclination to shapeshift into the many roles we play.

Sign up to our e-newsletter: